Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia ; 11: 100134, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248141

ABSTRACT

Background: A comprehensive study of the post-COVID syndrome (PCS) remains scarce in low-and middle-income countries. We assessed the prevalence, incidence rate, evolution over time, and risk factors of PCS among hospitalized (HS) and non-hospitalized (NHS) COVID-19 survivors. Methods: We undertook a prospective longitudinal study of COVID-19 survivors at months 1, 3, and 5 post-discharge or post-isolation period. The study was conducted at two COVID-19-designated hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, between December 2020 and October 2021. Findings: 362 participants were enrolled in the study; the median time from the onset of COVID-19 to enrolment was 57 days (IQR 41, 82). At enrolment, after adjusting for potential confounders, the HS more often had one or more symptoms, peripheral neuropathy (PN), depression and anxiety disorder, poor quality of life, dyspnea, tachycardia, restrictive lung disease on spirometry, anemia, proteinuria, and need for insulin therapy than the non-hospitalized group (95% CI > 1 for all). Although most of these findings decreased significantly over time in HS, PN increased in both groups. The incidence of diabetes was 9.8/1000 person-month, and the new requirement of insulin therapy was higher (aOR, 6.71; 95% CI, 2.87, 15.67) among HS than the NHS. Older age, being female, comorbidity, cigarette smoking, hospitalization, and contact with COVID-19 cases were independently associated with PCS. Interpretation: We observed a high burden of PCS in hospitalized and non-hospitalized survivors despite most findings' decreasing trend over time. Our results underscore the importance of continuing long-term follow-up and subsequent management. Funding: The United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

2.
Life (Basel) ; 12(12)2022 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2155185

ABSTRACT

Considering that it has been more than 24 months since SARS-CoV-2 emerged, it is crucial to identify measures that prevent and control pathogen transmission in workplace settings. Our aim was to report results of a hospital-based program that delivered hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) tablets as COVID-19 prophylaxis to the frontline healthcare workers (HCW)s who cared for COVID-19 patients and to evaluate the efficacy of HCQ. Setting and participants: Quasi-experimental, controlled, single-center study. The included participants were doctors, nurses, health workers, cleaning staff, and non-healthcare supportive staff. The main outcome was contracting COVID-19 anytime during the period of taking the prophylaxis, confirmed by RT-PCR. A total of 336 participants, without any clinical evidence of COVID-19 and without any known contact with family members, were included in the trial; 230 were assigned to HCQ and 106 declined to take any drug. Results: Among the participants, 43 (18.7%) in the HCQ group and 11 (10.4%) participants in the control group developed COVID-19. For the evaluation of side effects, we evaluated 12-lead ECGs of both groups at the baseline and after 4 weeks to monitor QTc interval. A total of 91% (198 of 217) participants in the prophylaxis group and 92% (11 of 12) in the control group had a QTc < 45o msec, which is within normal limits. Conclusions: Although the number of symptomatic infections in health personnel was lower in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. However, in the absence of any effective pre-exposure prophylaxis medicine for COVID-19, practicing proper infection prevention and control (IPC) and vaccination is the only way forward.

3.
J Clin Med ; 11(11)2022 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1953593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Starting on 31 December 2019, from Wuhan City, China, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic by 11 March 2020. Bangladesh detected its first case on 8 March 2020, only 66 days later the detection of the first case in China. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of Bangladeshi COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This retrospective chart analysis compared Bangladeshi COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia compared to those without hypoxemia treated in a makeshift COVID-19 unit of icddr,b. RESULTS: By March 2021, 207 remained in-patient. Nineteen patients (9.2%) died, whereas 10 (4.8%) were referred to different facilities for definitive care. Out of 207 in-patients, 88 patients required oxygen therapy. Multivariable logistic regression identified age (1.07 (1.02-1.13)), dyspnea (3.56 (1.06-11.96)), high CRP (1.13 (1.03-1.25)), and lymphopenia (6.18 (1.81-21.10)) as the independent predictors for hypoxemia in patients hospitalized for COVID 19 (for all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Older age, dyspnea, high CRP, and lymphopenia are simple, but important, clinical and laboratory parameters. These may help clinicians to identify COVID-19 patients early who are at risk of fatal hypoxemia. Close monitoring, and prompt and aggressive treatment of these patients would curb their morbidity and mortality, especially in resource-limited settings.

4.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e058074, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1874556

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with COVID-19 positivity among staff and their family members of icddr,b, a health research institute located in Bangladesh. SETTING: Dhaka, Bangladesh. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4295 symptomatic people were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse-transcription PCR between 19 March 2020 and 15 April 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify the factors associated with COVID-19 positivity by contrasting test positives with test negatives. RESULT: Forty-three per cent of the participants were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The median age was high in positive cases (37 years vs 34 years). Among the positive cases, 97% were recovered, 2.1% had reinfections, 24 died and 41 were active cases as of 15 April 2021. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age more than 60 years (adjusted OR (aOR)=2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.3; p<0.05), blood group AB (aOR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2; p<0.05), fever (aOR=3.1, 95% CI 2.6 to 3.7; p<0.05), cough (aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6; p<0.05) and anosmia (aOR=2.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.7; p<0.05) were significantly associated with higher odds of being COVID-19 positive when compared with participants who were tested negative. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that older age, fever, cough and anosmia were associated with COVID-19 among the study participants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Anosmia , Bangladesh/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cough , Family , Health Services Research , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Journal of Clinical Medicine ; 11(11):2968, 2022.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-1857707

ABSTRACT

Background: Starting on 31 December 2019, from Wuhan City, China, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic by 11 March 2020. Bangladesh detected its first case on 8 March 2020, only 66 days later the detection of the first case in China. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of Bangladeshi COVID-19 patients. Methods: This retrospective chart analysis compared Bangladeshi COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia compared to those without hypoxemia treated in a makeshift COVID-19 unit of icddr,b. Results: By March 2021, 207 remained in-patient. Nineteen patients (9.2%) died, whereas 10 (4.8%) were referred to different facilities for definitive care. Out of 207 in-patients, 88 patients required oxygen therapy. Multivariable logistic regression identified age (1.07 (1.02–1.13)), dyspnea (3.56 (1.06–11.96)), high CRP (1.13 (1.03–1.25)), and lymphopenia (6.18 (1.81–21.10)) as the independent predictors for hypoxemia in patients hospitalized for COVID 19 (for all, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Older age, dyspnea, high CRP, and lymphopenia are simple, but important, clinical and laboratory parameters. These may help clinicians to identify COVID-19 patients early who are at risk of fatal hypoxemia. Close monitoring, and prompt and aggressive treatment of these patients would curb their morbidity and mortality, especially in resource-limited settings.

6.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 1438, 2022 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1655618

ABSTRACT

The protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants by pre-existing antibodies elicited due to the current vaccination or natural infection is a global concern. We aimed to investigate the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its clinical features among infection-naïve, infected, vaccinated, and post-infection-vaccinated individuals. A cohort was designed among icddr,b staff registered for COVID-19 testing by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). Reinfection cases were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. From 19 March 2020 to 31 March 2021, 1644 (mean age, 38.4 years and 57% male) participants were enrolled; where 1080 (65.7%) were tested negative and added to the negative cohort. The positive cohort included 750 positive patients (564 from baseline and 186 from negative cohort follow-up), of whom 27.6% were hospitalized and 2.5% died. Among hospitalized patients, 45.9% had severe to critical disease and 42.5% required oxygen support. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were found significantly higher among the hospitalised patients compared to out-patients; risk ratio 1.3 and 1.6 respectively. The risk of infection among positive cohort was 80.2% lower than negative cohort (95% CI 72.6-85.7%; p < 0.001). Genome sequences showed that genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strains were responsible for reinfections. Naturally infected populations were less likely to be reinfected by SARS-CoV-2 than the infection-naïve and vaccinated individuals. Although, reinfected individuals did not suffer severe disease, a remarkable proportion of naturally infected or vaccinated individuals were (re)-infected by the emerging variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Reinfection/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/virology , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Complications/pathology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/metabolism , Reinfection/diagnosis , Reinfection/virology , Risk , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Severity of Illness Index , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL